Client trainingVisited 0 of 32 modulesEBITDA
After this module you can build EBITDA by hand from a P&L, explain each add back, say why a buyer or a lender starts there instead of at net income, and tell the difference between EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA.
Five minutes: EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, and why a documented add back is worth its amount times the multiple.
What it is
EBITDA is Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. Start with net income and add back four things that have little to do with how well the clinic itself runs: the interest on its loans, the income tax it pays, the depreciation of its equipment and the amortization of its start up and intangible costs. What is left is a rough measure of the cash the operation throws off before anyone decides how to finance it or how the tax code treats it.


Why anyone cares
Two clinics with identical patients, prices and staff can show very different net income. One bought its lasers with cash, the other with a loan (interest). One is a C corporation, the other an S corporation (taxes). One bought equipment last year, the other five years ago (depreciation). EBITDA strips those differences out so the two clinics can be compared, and so a buyer can ask "what would this operation earn under my financing and my tax situation?" That is why valuations are quoted as a multiple of EBITDA and why a lender sizes a loan on it.
Harbor Aesthetics, full year
Here is the sample clinic's annual P&L in the shape a buyer's accountant would put it in. Read down to net income, then build up.
| Harbor Aesthetics, Profit and Loss, full year | Amount | % of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,500,000 | 100.0% |
| Injectables | 830,000 | 55.3% |
| Laser, light and skin treatments | 400,000 | 26.7% |
| Memberships earned | 180,000 | 12.0% |
| Retail | 90,000 | 6.0% |
| Cost of services | 341,000 | 22.7% |
| Gross profit | 1,159,000 | 77.3% |
| Operating expenses | 1,025,000 | 68.3% |
| Provider wages and commissions 360,000; front desk and admin 110,000; payroll taxes and benefits 60,000; owner salary 150,000; rent 96,000; marketing 100,000; equipment lease 48,000; software 24,000; insurance 18,000; professional fees 15,000; utilities and other 44,000 | ||
| Depreciation | 60,000 | 4.0% |
| Operating income (EBIT) | 74,000 | 4.9% |
| Interest expense | 22,000 | 1.5% |
| Income tax | 11,000 | 0.7% |
| Net income | 41,000 | 2.7% |
Build it yourself
Start from net income. Tick each add back and watch the number change. The first four are the definition. The last three are the adjustments a buyer would negotiate, which is the difference between EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA.
Adjusted EBITDA and the credibility problem

Every seller wants to add back as much as possible. Every buyer wants to add back as little as possible. The adjustments that survive are the ones that can be proven from the books: a payroll register showing the owner's salary, an invoice for the rebrand, a vehicle lease in the owner's name. The adjustments that die are the ones that live in the seller's memory. This is the practical reason clean books matter: a documented add back is worth its amount times the multiple. An undocumented one is worth nothing.
Try it yourself
Net income 30,000; interest 8,000; depreciation 20,000; income tax 6,000. EBITDA is
30,00064,00016,000Why is depreciation added back?
Because equipment never loses valueBecause it is a non cash charge spreading a past purchase over timeBecause the IRS requires itWhich of these is a legitimate adjustment to EBITDA?
Provider commissionsA one time website rebrandMonthly rentA clinic shows adjusted EBITDA of 300,000 but the owner cannot document 120,000 of the add backs. A buyer will most likely value it on
300,000About 180,000, the documented portionNet incomeEBITDA is high but the bank balance keeps falling. The most likely explanation is
EBITDA is wrongCash is going to loan principal, equipment or inventory, none of which reduce EBITDARevenue is overstated